What doe the Washington Post have against the Redskins?
 

In todays Washington Post they report that Sean Taylor will not be able to make the workouts currently going on at Redskins Park. After reading the article I thought well atleat this time it seemed everyone was on the same page and after his trial he will be there.

Then I went to [url]http://www.redskins.com/[/url] where both Mark Brunell and Larry Michael report that Sean was infact at Redskins Park working out. What the hell? This is like the 2nd or 3rd time within a month that the Post is WRONG. Why should fans even bother with the Post if they are going to be Wrong atleast once a month.

Thank God for the Warpath...

Re: What doe the Washington Post have against the Redskins?
 

Well, he may be there now but it's possible that when everyone actually reports he won't be there. Besides, I think the organized workouts are still a ways off.

Re: What doe the Washington Post have against the Redskins?
 

The Post is definitely sucking lately. But I'll bet Taylor will end up missing some workouts because of his trial. He'll probably approach the workouts on a day-by-day basis. Make the ones he can make, miss the rest.

Re: What doe the Washington Post have against the Redskins?
 

who gives a rip about the post when you can get all your redskin info right here,plus here is alot more accurate

Re: What doe the Washington Post have against the Redskins?
 

I wish Redskins.com would utilize transcribers, and put it into print! I can't see or hear.

Re: What doe the Washington Post have against the Redskins?
 

I think last year the Redskins denounced the paper and said it was no longer the source for new on the skins.

Re: What doe the Washington Post have against the Redskins?
 

[QUOTE=backrow]I wish Redskins.com would utilize transcribers, and put it into print! I can't see or hear.[/QUOTE]

My bad!

I check Redskins.com, and sure enough, they have a story up! (Must be reading over my shoulder!)

Re: What doe the Washington Post have against the Redskins?
 

The Post and the Skins' owner are at war. The Post is pissed that Snyder is breaking news on redskins.com. That said, any true journalist won't let their bosses' battle get in the way of reporting on the Skins.

Re: What doe the Washington Post have against the Redskins?
 

us skin fans are just so damn sexy. there jealous

Re: What doe the Washington Post have against the Redskins?
 

[quote=BigSKINBauer]us skin fans are just so damn sexy. there jealous[/quote]

You sexy mother f***cker!!

Re: What doe the Washington Post have against the Redskins?
 

Also the Post was apparently pissed that the Skins cancelled the bulk of their season tickets. They used to give out tickets as perks to employees (from writers on down to delivery people), but it turned out that they were mostly just being sold. So the Skins enforced the "per account" season ticket limit on the Post (which had always been on the books, just not enforced) and they had to give up several hundred seats.

Re: What doe the Washington Post have against the Redskins?
 

It's odd in this case becuase apparently the post's sources were Taylor's lawyers. Maybe they're surprised that Sean is in DC? Or maybe they said Sean will be in FLA for the trial, so he won't be at OTAs, meaning: When the trial is on, Sean will obviously be here. But otherwise, not.

Whatever the mix up, skins.com are super happy to point it out!

It's nice to have mulitple sources--the Post has been weak lately, but no doubt at some point they'll have something that the skins don't want us to know. My attitude is great, the more info I can get, the better. How else am I gonna waste my time in the offseason? ;)

Re: What doe the Washington Post have against the Redskins?
 

the post's info came straight from sean's laywers, that's a good source, and the permitted time off is probably accurate too. That doesn't mean sean has to miss every practice if he doesn't want to, but it kinda seems like the skins are TRYING to feed missinformation to the post on purpose.

Re: What doe the Washington Post have against the Redskins?
 

ESPN has been reporting on radio all day the based on a statement from ST's legal team that "after much discussion, both ST and his legal team argree that he must miss first camp for trial prep". After much consideration, I'm sure ST can be of great value in prepping his defense!

Re: What doe the Washington Post have against the Redskins?
 

nice.