Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Eric Steinbach or Derrick Dockery? (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=16579)

Bill B 12-29-2006 10:36 AM

Eric Steinbach or Derrick Dockery?
 
I have seen on many free agent articles that Eric Steinbach is the best rated free agent guard on the market. We all know that Derrick Dockery is going to test the free agent market - so the question is what should the FO do - resign Derrick Dockery for the sake of conitunity or go after Eric Steinbach?

MTK 12-29-2006 10:39 AM

Re: Steinbach or Dockery?
 
I think Dock is a better fit here and for the sake of continuity I really hope we re-sign him.

gibbsisgod 12-29-2006 10:42 AM

Re: Steinbach or Dockery?
 
It will probably be better all the way around to sign Dockery. He will come cheaper, he knows the offense and the other lineman are lobbying for him already.

MonkFan4Life 12-29-2006 10:44 AM

Re: Steinbach or Dockery?
 
Keep Dockery, he's been here and it shows the players that are here that the team is willing to build from within and not always going for a free-agent. The Redskins have the persona of a team that doesn't keep their own players. If Gibbs and Co. are trying to change the identity of this franchise then keeping our own players is one thing that has to be done. I understand that there has to be a weeding out process at times but for the most part keeping our guys together is the best thing. So I say hold onto Dock and keep this line together.

MTK 12-29-2006 10:48 AM

Re: Steinbach or Dockery?
 
Samuels I guess has already offered to restructure his contract to free up the $ for Dockery.

12thMan 12-29-2006 10:49 AM

Re: Steinbach or Dockery?
 
[quote=Mattyk72;264516]Samuels I guess has already offered to restructure his contract to free up the $ for Dockery.[/quote]


Just in?

dmek25 12-29-2006 10:58 AM

Re: Steinbach or Dockery?
 
re sign dockery. continuity in offensive line play is a big must

MTK 12-29-2006 11:00 AM

Re: Steinbach or Dockery?
 
[quote=12thMan;264517]Just in?[/quote]

That news is a few days old, it was reported on Redskins radio

FRPLG 12-29-2006 11:26 AM

Re: Steinbach or Dockery?
 
Keep Hickory Dickory Dock. He'll be a better value.

Longtimefan 12-29-2006 11:35 AM

Re: Steinbach or Dockery?
 
Dockery will resign. It's important we keep this line together. Dock is one of the most improved players on the team.

TheMalcolmConnection 12-29-2006 11:37 AM

Re: Steinbach or Dockery?
 
Yup, everyone always wants to give him crap, but he's been a GREAT guard for us over this year.

Jamaican'Skin 12-29-2006 11:41 AM

Re: Steinbach or Dockery?
 
Keep the continuity of the Dirtbagz. We've only given up 18 sacks this season, and Ladell has looked like a star running thru those holes. In a season of pure disappointment, they have been one of the few bright spots on the team. Their continuity is imperative

celts32 12-29-2006 12:06 PM

Re: Steinbach or Dockery?
 
Steinbach might be a little better but we need cohesion...keep the line intact! Otherwise we have a half a season of growing pains waiting for the new line combination to gell. This is the perfect example of when the skins get to cute for their own good...instead of signing their own they always look to see if there is someone out there better. The line has been much better the past month or so and looks like it may have gelled...don't f-ck that up!

dall-assblows 12-29-2006 12:08 PM

Re: Steinbach or Dockery?
 
dock wants to be here anyways

Schneed10 12-29-2006 12:27 PM

Re: Steinbach or Dockery?
 
Team chemistry and cohesion are just as important as talent. Steinbach and Dockery aren't far off in talent in my view.

Dock is the no brainer choice.

This thread is borderline silly.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 0.74500 seconds with 9 queries