Suitors for the sixth. Good Read.
 

Check it out.[url=http://redskins.scout.com/2/625529.html]Scout.com: Do the Skins Bly in?[/url]

Re: Suitors for the sixth. Good Read.
 

I hope they hit the note at the bottom of page. Let's get guard Edwin Mulitalo in here, could be a WELL needed pickup.

Re: Suitors for the sixth. Good Read.
 

Thanks. That was a good read.

Re: Suitors for the sixth. Good Read.
 

Excellent read. To get Bly, keep Springs, and have Smoot and Rogers would definately be nice on paper. Do the Skins have the money to keep Springs at his current asking price though if Bly were signed? In addition, would Taylor be comfortable converting to SS? Would Springs be able to make the transisition to FS?

Re: Suitors for the sixth. Good Read.
 

I wonder if we will go after Ian from the bears

Re: Suitors for the sixth. Good Read.
 

its a great trade for the skins but i dont get the broncos wanting to give up that much just for that pick. i say that these are all just rumors

Re: Suitors for the sixth. Good Read.
 

It's nice to know that we are in the catbird seat for a change.....I hope we don't blow it.

There is one flaw in this guys logic - Cleveland is definitely going to draft Peterson. That's why they traded Droughns to the Giants and only signed Lewis to a 1 year deal. Still a good read...can anyone forward it to the Skin's FO?

Re: Suitors for the sixth. Good Read.
 

[quote=81forHOF;286661]It's nice to know that we are in the catbird seat for a change.....I hope we don't blow it.

There is one flaw in this guys logic - Cleveland is definitely going to draft Peterson. That's why they traded Droughns to the Giants and only signed Lewis to a 1 year deal. Still a good read...can anyone forward it to the Skin's FO?[/quote]
Good idea!
To give the FO a little credit as of late, we seem to have a business plan, and sticking to it, for once in a LONG TIME. :goodjob:

Re: Suitors for the sixth. Good Read.
 

I'm glad that I fianally have seen my point of view. We SHOULD be trying to move Rogers to nickle back! If we could get Bly, Rogers and his "auto 10" wouldn't be forced to start. And to think when we drafted this guy, Shawn Merriman and Damarcus Ware were still on the board!

Re: Suitors for the sixth. Good Read.
 

good article. it makes a lot of sense, but you kinda figure the news guys would have let us know by now if there was any real interest in mulitalo :/.

I'd still like to get him (maybe he's looking for too much so they passed??), but maybe they've worked out some draft deals that they think will cover it (though that could be very risky).

Re: Suitors for the sixth. Good Read.
 

[quote=That Guy;286671]good article. it makes a lot of sense, but you kinda figure the news guys would have let us know by now if there was any real interest in mulitalo :/.

I'd still like to get him (maybe he's looking for too much so they passed??), but maybe they've worked out some draft deals that they think will cover it (though that could be very risky).[/quote]


I haven't heard anything about mulitalo, he would be a great prospect. I hope we hear his name come up at REDSKIN park.

Re: Suitors for the sixth. Good Read.
 

If Springs stays, he should play corner. I don't know why people want to move him to safety. Pray-low can play safety. Would you rather have Springs or Smoot playing CB (everything being equal, blah, blah, blah)?