[artmonkforhallofamein07]

Yeah I am not mad about that. I also think if III hadn't hurt himself or was more durable through his first year, he would have been #1.

I think it's interesting that people seem to think now that III had more weapons, when I this time last year the debate was centered around they both havin equal talent to work with for the most part.

If we had indy's d through the first 9 games I also think we would have had a better record, but I neither here nor there considering we don't know what there d would have done against our opponents and vice versa.