Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012
I'm not in disagreement necessarily about the quality of our depth vs. Dallas',
|
Yes you specifically disagreed with me by saying their depth is like ours, I specifically listed out the comparable offensive depth chart, and they are not as you said earlier : "Their depth is like ours, it's highly concentrated." It's just blatantly wrong.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012
but I do see that you've bought into the narrative around this team, so there's really no point for me to take the discussion further.
|
I will take it further. I'm not "buying in to the narrative", in my position by position listing, it shows that our depth is more consistent (not claiming star power, just solid depth) and that better depth also shows when our twos are playing "mano y mano" in preseason against other teams ones (or 3 vs 2 etc).
Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012
I'll gladly concede any debate about the Redskins and the Cowboys depth charts,
|
Good
Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012
but you can't look at our backup OL, see starting quality across the board, and be taken seriously. It's a non-starter.
|
Depth is not for "starting quality" it's for the ability to play at a position with the least amount of dropoff if called upon. I said almost all our OL is starting quality, I don't really think Polumbus should be starting in a non-zone blocking, or straight drop type offense, but he does fit the bare minimum for what our offense needs most of the time, the backups all are cross trained (minus Compton) and we could suffer a loss at one position(excluding our Stud LT), and not have our line deteriorate completely. There just aren't many teams that have starting quality OL backups, and maybe only 1 or two who could replace their LT without a drop in performance. Bottomline, you are setting a false goal if you think any team has 8 starting quality OL, and I certainly never claimed or implied we did.