Quote:
Originally Posted by KI Skins Fan
Well, try to understand these things, as well:
1. Why wouldn't this coaching staff stay with the no-huddle offense against a depleted Cowboys DL when it was working well and wearing down the Dallas defensive linemen?
2. Why can't the this coaching staff manage the clock?
3. Why can't the Redskins Special Teams do anything right?
4. Why would a HC leave a seriously injured Franchise QB in a game until that QB suffers a catastrophic knee injury?
5. Why did the Redskins defense give up 500 yards of offense in three consecutive games?
6. Why is the OC so hands-on in coaching the QB's and WR's rather than leaving it to the position coaches?
7. Etc., etc., etc.
|
1. Yup, I am with you on that.
2. Still hanging with you.
3. Yup, still looking good.
4. Oops, you just took a wrong turn into rehashed opinionated stupidville.
5. I dunno ... just like your list, it's all just opinion, but perhaps ... (a) b/c they were strapped with an offseason penalty that left unable to do anything but try to keep as many of the pieces of an NFC East Division winning team together as they could; (b) their star QB was still shaking off the rust and was not as far along as had been hoped causing the offense to sputter and forcing the defense coming back onto the field; (c) b/c the offensive players were performing at a sub-par level and turning the ball over to high powered offenses; (d) the offenses we faced were really good; or (e) the players on the field were missing more tackles than any other team in the league and led the league in allowing yards after contact (i.e. they were put in places to succeed, but failed to do so).
6. First - you know
for a fact that (a) this is going on; and (b) the position coaches oppose it and believe it to be detrimental to the players and the actual in-game happenings? Cite me the quote/link please.
Even if KS is more "hands on" for certain aspects of the offense he supervises, maybe, just maybe, the OC thinks the position coaches under him need better supervision and assistance and is giving it to them in the same way any supervisor would assist their mid-level managers in hopes of locating problems and improving the final product? BUT NO ... You're right. Despite merely (what I suspect to be) vague rumors of "over involvement" in the work of his direct reports, the
only possible conclusion is that KS is an intrusive, interfering micromanager who ignores his primary job.
7. It's all the coaches fault, it's all the coaches fault, it's all the coaches fault.
Quote:
Originally Posted by KI Skins Fan
Possible answer: This coaching staff sucks?
|
Clearly, the only rational conclusion is that they can and never have done anything right.
