Quote:
Originally Posted by RedskinRat
The god botherer didn't make his intent clear, he changed the thrust of his argument by stating the following:
"Science, however, has most certainly been used to justify racism. "
Then changing it to:
"perversions of the scientific process have been used to justify racism and a host of other abuses".
Mmmm, intent! Smells like 'BACKPEDAL'!
In my defence (because I'm Anglo-American) I was typing on my cell phone when I left off the 'You' whilst working on a complicated system install at work. I'm far more relaxed now.
CRedskinsRule, you seem to be an expert in reading 'intent' in a communication. What am I intending to call you, right now? Should be easy, right?
|
LOL I am pretty sure you intended to call me a "saint", with all the connotations that you might personally ascribe to them.
JR's first sentence and second sentence don't have any form of backpedal in them. The first takes the general noun of "SCIENCE" (for my purposes said in a cute and cuddly penguin voice) and the second shows the form of "SCIENCE" which has definitely been used by humans with bad INTENT to do bad things.
Substituting RELIGION (in cute and cuddly pope voice LOL[ LOL is included for showing intent of making a joke]) and "perversion of religious precepts" in the above two sentences gives you:
RELIGION(Science), however, has most certainly been used to justify racism.
perversions of the religious precepts(perversions of the scientific process) have been used to justify racism and a host of other abuses
Pretty clear that JR was, as he later said, trying to provoke a realization of a logical fallacy.