View Single Post
Old 02-22-2014, 08:34 PM   #11
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 58
Posts: 21,744
Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
I disagree. Two years is plenty. More time just allows for revisionism.
How can 2 years be plenty when you can't even judge one draft in 3 years?

Not to mention how subjective early evaluation of draft picks are to begin with, right now we have ROY campaign and one average campaign for Griffin, weighed against a lackluster performance by Tannehill (presumed qb with no trade) and good dealing by St.Louis that we would not have done anyway (not trading our pick to Dallas and they aren't offering us what they gave St Louis) .

I would think you could legitimately need 5 years from the date of the trade barring a SB or an incredible bust for Griffin.
CRedskinsRule is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
 
Page generated in 0.89713 seconds with 10 queries