View Single Post
Old 06-26-2014, 12:16 AM   #310
FRPLG
MVP
 
FRPLG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 10,164
Re: Redskins Trademark cancelled

Quote:
Originally Posted by itvnetop View Post
But the point stands that the word itself is disparaging, as defined by today's dictionaries.
The point may stand but is a weak point.

In the real world...not on paper or the internet...how is the term being used today in a generally disparaging way? How was it ever used in a generally disparaging why?

A discussion on whether to change a name or ban a term because it is offensive ought to start with the aggrieved party
A) actually being reasonably offended
B) able to show said examples of said offense

This seems like it should be simple enough. Instead the supporters of a name-change just say its offensive and move forward with their agenda. As far as I can tell its eerily similar to a Big Lie...tell everyone long enough that it's offensive and everyone will soon be offended by it.
FRPLG is offline  

Advertisements
 
Page generated in 0.14681 seconds with 10 queries