Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

FRPLG · 09-21-2005, 10:29 AM

Honestly I felt like most of their pressure came on LB stunts and safety blitzes. They did get 2.5 sack from their line (Ellis-1, Canty-1, Spears-.5) but the rest came from LBs. I know on at least two that they were coverage sacks where brunell had no where to throw the ball and just took the sack. Rabach got manhandled a little but Glover was crazy quick off the snap a bunch of times and that is real difficult to block when you're snapping and getting blown up at the same time. All in all I felt like with the quality of their front 7 and the amount of gimmicks used to pressure the QB they held up good enough. I was more concerned with out inability to pressure Bledsoe even a little bit with our front 4. We need Arrington back 100% to take some pressure of those front 4.

09-21-2005, 10:29 AM	#9
FRPLG MVP Join Date: May 2004 Age: 47 Posts: 10,164	Re: O line Honestly I felt like most of their pressure came on LB stunts and safety blitzes. They did get 2.5 sack from their line (Ellis-1, Canty-1, Spears-.5) but the rest came from LBs. I know on at least two that they were coverage sacks where brunell had no where to throw the ball and just took the sack. Rabach got manhandled a little but Glover was crazy quick off the snap a bunch of times and that is real difficult to block when you're snapping and getting blown up at the same time. All in all I felt like with the quality of their front 7 and the amount of gimmicks used to pressure the QB they held up good enough. I was more concerned with out inability to pressure Bledsoe even a little bit with our front 4. We need Arrington back 100% to take some pressure of those front 4.