View Single Post
Old 12-06-2014, 01:42 PM   #77
SirLK26
The Starter
 
SirLK26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,141
Re: Blown Coverages - Who do we blame?!

Quote:
Originally Posted by over the mountain View Post
the blown zone coverages seem to be simple tampa 2 or 3 deep zones where a corner (like amerson) is supposed to drop back deep and play a quarter but doesnt.
Cooley makes it sound like the secondary's problems come from a mix of communication issues and sometimes flat out not doing the right assignment. So to me our secondary problems are more on the players than the coaches. Otherwise, how is Breeland, as a rookie, the best player in the secondary? He's getting the same coaching the other guys are. Not saying Haslett should stay, because you'd think after 4 years he'd have made progress in some basic areas and he really hasn't, but he's never had a lot to work with either. Sadly, I have no faith we'll find more Breeland's in the draft next year, with or without Haslett.

It was funny to me a while back when Clark and Breeland said the secondary needed to communicate better, while Amerson and Meriweather were saying the communication was fine. Maybe I'm making too much out of this, but is it a coincidence that Clark and Breeland are Gruden guys?

Last edited by SirLK26; 12-06-2014 at 04:21 PM. Reason: Clarification in second sentence
SirLK26 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
 
Page generated in 1.05486 seconds with 10 queries