Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SUNRA
I don't mean to waste your time with the past, but here are the facts that I spoke of last year that were an opinion shared by many commentators and by Gibbs himself.
1.Ramsey is indecisive and holds on to the ball too long which contributed to a lot of the sacks he accumulated when Spurrier was the coach and after the Spurrier era.
2.Ramsey had not developed the ability to read the defense and call an audible in time. (Too many delay of game calls called when he does it.)
3.Ramsey turns the ball over too much which will eventually land him on the bench and send him out of D.C.
4.Ramsey is not the future of Washington Redskins. He's hasn't played an entire season to even be given the NFL's wealthiest franchise with the inconsistent plays he has exhibited throughtout his career as a Redskin.
Please tell me what part of these facts/opinions you have a problem with. Notice I didn't use the regular verbiage "he sucks" that's used to regularly describe Brunell's play.
|
LOL man, jeez please people the argument is laid out. I think it is very reasonable, it may not be what others believe but it is not without truth. Bottom line no matter how you slice it is the guy was replaced by a staff that only had to gain by him succeeding. He played himself out of a job. He is more talented, younger, stronger armed but they didn't go with him. I love Ramsey if I had my way he would be a a pro bowl player that didn't turn the ball over but it isn't the case. Please stop jumping on everyone who thinks we may have increaseed our chances of winning by benching the guy. I hope this lights a fire under his ass so he will play himself back into a job somehow.