Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

hurrykaine · 10-02-2005, 09:04 PM

Brunell was efficient. Play calling certainly deteriorated in the 4th Q.

That INT was neither Portis' nor Brunell's fault. It wasn't a good throw, but it was a freak INT - good alertness and reflex by the defender.

It's hard to sit an hypothesize about how well we would've done in this game with Ramsey, but I highly doubt that Ramsey would've made the scramble on 3rd and 9 to get us into hawks territory - he would've tried to force a throw in that situation and had it batted down or picked.

Must say Gibbs' move to start Brunell is looking good as of now.

10-02-2005, 09:04 PM	#31
hurrykaine Impact Rookie Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Washington, D.C. Age: 53 Posts: 762	Re: Brunell Brunell was efficient. Play calling certainly deteriorated in the 4th Q. That INT was neither Portis' nor Brunell's fault. It wasn't a good throw, but it was a freak INT - good alertness and reflex by the defender. It's hard to sit an hypothesize about how well we would've done in this game with Ramsey, but I highly doubt that Ramsey would've made the scramble on 3rd and 9 to get us into hawks territory - he would've tried to force a throw in that situation and had it batted down or picked. Must say Gibbs' move to start Brunell is looking good as of now.