Quote:
|
Originally Posted by wolfeskins
i'm mainly talking about your comment when you said you "bet there would have been more deeper completions" with ramsey as the starter. i believe the seahawks would have blitzed even more than they did and thus ramsey not having the time to sit in the pocket and make the deep throw.
|
Good point, it's pointless to play guessing games as to what Ramsey would have done, because the circumstances would have been totally different.
Seattle would have had a different gameplan and attacked differently. It's not as cut and dry as saying well if Ramsey was in there he would have completed more deep passes. He could have also been sacked a few more times, thrown another INT or two, or not as been effective on 3rd downs.
This Ramsey stuff is really getting tired.