Quote:
Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule
Really stretching the point there. If you want to take a qb, you don't drop to the bottom of a round from the top. Between that, SM's drafting history, and the lack of agreement in general on this board, I think you are just barking up the wrong tree.
|
It was speculation which I admit isn't really meaningful in this discussion but if others are gonna throw out there speculations then my speculation is equally as valid or not.
And again. I am not trying to make a point only to have a dialogue.
Teams trade down all the time with the expectation that the player they want will still be on the board. Sometimes it works sometimes it doesn't. To me the process is an unknown so the speculation can go either way.
Scott's drafting history (btw Scott wasn't the principal decision maker in his previous spots) doesn't have bearing on whether not taking a QB in this situation was the right decision.
I'm perfectly comfortable with disagreement.
We could go pick by pick and I'm sure there would be disagreement. I was one of the people, even before the draft, that thought Scherff was both an OT as opposed to a guard and worthy of the 5th pick. I'm sure those were minority opinions before the draft. And this thread was meant as a discussion.
Quote:
|
What could anyone say that would make you change your mind?
|
I'm not sure, what would change your mind?