Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

Coff · 06-09-2015, 10:59 AM

There's a better argument to be made that last year's team won more games than it should have. Look, if you go 4-12, you should lose three times as many close games as you win. The Skins went 3-3 in close games, 1-9 in games that weren't close. Skins won one game by two points, one game by three points, and another game in overtime. All of those games could have easily been lost, more so than the three close games they lost could have been won. In other words, the Skins were closer to a 1-15 team than a 7-9 team, that's for sure. I'd say 4-12 is a pretty good indication of the team we were last year; but perhaps 3-13 would have been a bit more illustrative of who we were.

06-09-2015, 10:59 AM	#11
Coff Impact Rookie Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Halfmoon, NY Posts: 688	Re: Last year's team There's a better argument to be made that last year's team won more games than it should have. Look, if you go 4-12, you should lose three times as many close games as you win. The Skins went 3-3 in close games, 1-9 in games that weren't close. Skins won one game by two points, one game by three points, and another game in overtime. All of those games could have easily been lost, more so than the three close games they lost could have been won. In other words, the Skins were closer to a 1-15 team than a 7-9 team, that's for sure. I'd say 4-12 is a pretty good indication of the team we were last year; but perhaps 3-13 would have been a bit more illustrative of who we were.