Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

That Guy · 10-03-2005, 06:02 PM

i think pierce sheds blocks (and therefor) plays the run better, and had a small edge in presnap positioning of players... marshall is a bit faster and slightly better in coverage (since he used to be a safety).

I personally would have rather had pierce with marshall as depth.

10-03-2005, 06:02 PM	#3
That Guy Living Legend Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: VA Age: 43 Posts: 17,620	Re: Marshall vs. Pierce i think pierce sheds blocks (and therefor) plays the run better, and had a small edge in presnap positioning of players... marshall is a bit faster and slightly better in coverage (since he used to be a safety). I personally would have rather had pierce with marshall as depth.