Quote:
Originally Posted by 30gut
It seems many fans along with J are of the mindset you express above.
The flip side, which I'm sure is hard for you to see, is that while Griff isn't a fit for J that doesn't mean he's not a fit in another offense. And IF that is true then it would be a mistake to get rid of Griffin IF J (the reason Griff is gone) fails.
By keeping Griffin the team hedges against a J-Kirk failure.
The 5th year option is still an issue but outside of the money (which can be massaged) getting rid of Griff doesn't bring any gain on the football field.
|
Why would a team build an entire offense around a guy that is as durable as a faberge egg, has become incredibly one dimensional, and has shown no progress in 3 years?
Kyle Shanahan did that already. Griffin broke, and the rest is history.
Now, after completely revamping personnel and coaching staff he can't adapt.
It's basically employing the exact opposite strategy Seattle build their depth and thus success with . Year after year they kept getting younger and deeper.
They also kept plugging in one QB after another until they found a gem in Wilson.
If I understand you correctly, you're advocating continually changing coaches, systems, and possibly personnel; all to accommodate the diminishing skill set of one player who had 1 good year?
Or, at least be willing to change all that if Kirk doesn't work out?
Wouldn't it be quicker, more cost effective, and ultimately more successful to just copy Seattle?