Quote:
Originally Posted by NoCalHail
It's one thing to pick Green Bay, but the arguments made in that article are obviously coming from someone who doesn't watch much of the 'Skins.....
"You keep waiting for the bad Cousins to show up; turnover traits are in play" Oh really? I was one of Kirk's biggest critics early in the season because of his turnovers, but those "turnover traits" have all but gone away. It doesn't mean he will never throw a pick again, and if we were playing Seattle, a team I'd expect to produce a lot tighter coverage and perhaps be able to disguise their defense a lot better then yeah I could understand those comments, but what leads "experts" to think Kirk will be a turnover machine against this Packers defense?
I think when it comes down to it, a lot of these analysts are just defaulting to Aaron Rodgers in the Wildcard game as being reason enough to pick the packers. They think Aaron Rodgers alone can make up for the rest of the Packers's deficiencies regardless of how any of the other matchups go.
|
In a QB league, most will do that. I assume just about every pundit will pick GB just because of Rodgers. But we are good at home and GB is struggling right now. Their OL and receivers are not what they have had in the past so I dont think it will be as easy as a lot think it will. Their defense has a good pass rush but not much else. If our OL can keep KC clean, I think we have a good chance of extending our season.