Quote:
Originally Posted by That Guy
if you're including your team (ie guys on the last year of their deal) then it's not really about getting the best player period.
|
I can't imagie (other then Vinnie-Dannny) that any FO evaluates their team in a 1 year vacuum.
Quote:
|
...by that logic we would take 0 WRs this year, cause none will be better than PG or DJ, and then in 2017, we'd potentially end up with crowder as our #1 and nothing else. you can't just look at things in a vacuum, which means you're accounting for need in some respect.
|
To be clear, the above is based on some 1 year vacuum logic that you invented. Not my view.
When a team evaluates the BPA they are doing so against their own team not just this year but headed into the future. And maybe for you none of the WR prospects are grade out higher then our current WRs but that is not the case for me in the slightest.
Quote:
|
and scot does look at future years. he's said so, that's why he didn't really look at CBs last year, because he thought this year's crop was better.
|
Looking at future years and basing draft day decisions on future drafts are 2 completely separate things. I don't claim to know why Scott did or didn't make certain draft decisions. I think that type of speculation is pointless not to mention unknowable.