View Single Post
Old 10-11-2005, 05:21 PM   #5
12thMan
MVP
 
12thMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
Re: Did anyone else watch Comcast postgame? (Lavar Related)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Longtimefan
There have been so many pro's and con's WOW!!!! When all the dust clears, I'm truly interested in seeing what the final LaVar outcome is going to be.

Eighteen months ago JG and GW were the sweetest thing since sugar, now with the benching of one overated player they no longer know what they're doing. I find this all very difficult to comprehend. I say overated because there are a lot of inflated opinions relative to LaVar. Before long we'll be ready to dismiss both JG and GW because we know more about the game and who should, and should not be playing.

People, this coaching staff does not owe us any explanations "PERIOD" The only one they have to answer too is DS and if he's not complaining, the only thing we pay to do is watch. If you don't want to watch you don't have too. I certainly hope JG GW and the rest of the coaching staff does not read this stuff because they probably would be ready to leave town after witnessing such distrust.

Mr. Dan Snyder!! You played Chess with LaVar on the plane ride, the Warden cannot play games with the inmates. (Just Kidding) However there is an old saying "If you play with a Puppy, he'll lick you in the face". I know JG has warned you about that.
No, it's not that they don't what they are doing. I don't believe any rational Skins fan would come to that conclusion, unless they are being emotional. Gibbs and Williams definitely know what they are doing - for sure.

Here's the issue at hand: Is there more to it than what we are being told? Yes, I've seen all the Gregg Williams, Joe Gibbs, and LaVar interviews. (And no, they don't owe us any explanation either) - but it has to be more than he doesn't know the system or he doesn't practice well. That won't fly either.
12thMan is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
 
Page generated in 0.11980 seconds with 10 queries