Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post - Did anyone else watch Comcast postgame? (Lavar Related)

#56fanatic · 10-12-2005, 10:22 AM

If the man is saying he's not getting any reps in practice, then how is he going to get the assignments down. It would be a different story if he was getting the reps and then the coacheds saying "hes just not getting it" I love the Redskins, Joe and love what GW is doing with the D. I am only saying what was heard on 980, about the coaching staff lying. There is always going to be alot of he said this and that, but if you look at what happened to Coles, when he voiced his displessure, hes gone, Ramsey the same thing. Joe couldn't wait for something to happen to put Brunnell in. Now we have gotten the better end of those two deals, assumming Brunell keeps playing good football, which I think he will. However, there will be one of these episodes that bites us in the butt, and this may be one of them. The players aren't going to get caught up in saying GW should play this guy or that guy, they dont want to lose their jobs or create a divided locker room. which I give them credit for. The biggest thing I have heard is Marcus saying LaVar is a playmaker, and they could use that on the field. Its simple, if a guy has been to 3 pro bowls, continually adjusting to 5 different defenses in 5 seasons. Making HUGE adjustments in Marvin Lewis's D then I dont see how this is any different. If Sterling Sharpe breaks down two plays against Chicago, and shows LaVar out of position, show me two plays of the 40 or so the defense is on the field and lets see if Marcus is out of position on any of those. or Sean Taylor, or Holdman, Daniels. I find it hard to believe that those guys are in position every single play of every single game. Wasn't the two long runs from Bell attributed to guys being out of position? I know you are going to say, well of those two plays LaVar is out of position, look Sterling, you , me and everyone else does not know where LaVar was suppose to be on those particular plays, only the coaches and LaVar. I know if week 1, of the few plays he was in, he made more tackles than Holdman has made in two weeks. Now to make tackles you have to be in position, or running the play down across the field. Lets face it, alot of us want LaVar to play and for some unknown reason(understanding the D isn't one of them) he isn't. We all better hope if he goes somewhere else, its in the AFC.

10-12-2005, 10:22 AM	#2
#56fanatic The Starter Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Charlotte NC Age: 51 Posts: 1,801	Re: Just Play Me!! If the man is saying he's not getting any reps in practice, then how is he going to get the assignments down. It would be a different story if he was getting the reps and then the coacheds saying "hes just not getting it" I love the Redskins, Joe and love what GW is doing with the D. I am only saying what was heard on 980, about the coaching staff lying. There is always going to be alot of he said this and that, but if you look at what happened to Coles, when he voiced his displessure, hes gone, Ramsey the same thing. Joe couldn't wait for something to happen to put Brunnell in. Now we have gotten the better end of those two deals, assumming Brunell keeps playing good football, which I think he will. However, there will be one of these episodes that bites us in the butt, and this may be one of them. The players aren't going to get caught up in saying GW should play this guy or that guy, they dont want to lose their jobs or create a divided locker room. which I give them credit for. The biggest thing I have heard is Marcus saying LaVar is a playmaker, and they could use that on the field. Its simple, if a guy has been to 3 pro bowls, continually adjusting to 5 different defenses in 5 seasons. Making HUGE adjustments in Marvin Lewis's D then I dont see how this is any different. If Sterling Sharpe breaks down two plays against Chicago, and shows LaVar out of position, show me two plays of the 40 or so the defense is on the field and lets see if Marcus is out of position on any of those. or Sean Taylor, or Holdman, Daniels. I find it hard to believe that those guys are in position every single play of every single game. Wasn't the two long runs from Bell attributed to guys being out of position? I know you are going to say, well of those two plays LaVar is out of position, look Sterling, you , me and everyone else does not know where LaVar was suppose to be on those particular plays, only the coaches and LaVar. I know if week 1, of the few plays he was in, he made more tackles than Holdman has made in two weeks. Now to make tackles you have to be in position, or running the play down across the field. Lets face it, alot of us want LaVar to play and for some unknown reason(understanding the D isn't one of them) he isn't. We all better hope if he goes somewhere else, its in the AFC.