Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231
good post...I agree with most. I think the wall (which by the way is strategically already erected from 10 years ago in some places) should go up in other places it is not ie: places where people(farmers, land owners) that feel generally unsafe that proven unknowns (ie human trafficker, gun and drug runners) cross. Blanket policies and acts generally don't work...so a policy of build a complete wall is foolish.
|
I am sure there is already a wall/fence in place in well-populated areas, so I'm not sure if he plans to strengthen those or what, but if he is envisioning a great wall of china type ordeal that is just a waste. There's a million ways to get around it. They'll switch to boats. They'll make larger tunnels. They will keep flying into the US on visas then staying when the visa expires. They'll attack the wall when the border patrol isn't watching. A wall is just a feel-good concept to make people feel better.
Not just that but why not use that money to expand the fleet, put more boots on the ground, throw in more motion sensors, maybe develop or even expand technology that helps them detect tunnels (which are already a major source of contraband coming north).
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection
This is 100% how I feel. 100%.
|
Thanks. Nice edit btw,
. I gave up on the Drumpf name a while ago, it seems like nobody cares about that one. Glad to see somebody is still using it.