[itvnetop]

I tend to analyze news from all sources, including the tweet I posted. Chad Ryan may be random to people who don't know him, but he holds water for a sizable group that does. In other words, he's not one to post rumors for click bait. His sources are usually credible- he may or may not have been given a false leak this time around. It remains to be seen. But why is he considered less reputable than anything that comes out of Bruce Allen's mouth or anyone from the Post nowadays? The Internet is the news medium, whether you like it or not.

This is a thread called "Kirk Cousins 365". People are going to post rumors on both sides of the spectrum. If we really are going to vet sources and cite everything in MLA format (hyperbole I know), it kind of detracts from the whole entertainment value of forums in general.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk