Quote:
|
Originally Posted by cpayne5
Do you people even read the board?
|
That's funny. I didn't name anyone specifically, but since I'm being called out, here you go.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Exoffender
With LA in the lineup we'd probably would have given up more 30+ yard TD runs.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by offiss
Lavar on the bench is really know surprise, he was the most overated player in football, except now everyone knows it.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by skinsguy
Funny, but for all the newly acquired Gregg Williams haters, take away those three big plays and look how solid this defense has been WITHOUT Lavar Arrington.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by heybigstar
I sincerely doubt Lavar Arrington is the same player as he was before. If he cant be a better pass-rushing threat than Chris Clemons, something is seriously wrong. Gregg Williams puts on the field the players that give him the best chance of winning.
|
Sorry for picking on skinsguy and bigstar, because about 90% of you made this kind of comment. Theirs were just the most direct that I found. And many others masked their comments with phrases like "I like LaVar, but...", so I left those out. As I said, everyone magically forgets the comments they made dissing LaVar and his ability, but if everyone agreed on the subject, why were the LaVar threads 20 pages long?
As a side note, I could care less if anyone retracts anything they said about LaVar. I was just explaining to #56fanatic not to expect any. Although, I do think it's funny that many of the Brunell haters(myself included) were more than willing to accept that we were wrong about him, but no one wants to admit that they were the least bit wrong about LaVar.