Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

FRPLG · 10-24-2005, 11:34 AM

Excuse me but WTF? Generalizing the arguments is somewhat silly to do but if you're going to do it then do it correctly. I think if you looked through everything that was said (good luck that'll take you all day) the main argument was that people trusted the coaches. Not that Arrington wasn't any good. Saying 90% of us said similar things is simply untrue.

And to rebutt your rebutts.
Exoffender: I'll give you this one.
Offiss: A perrenial Arrington anti-fan. You get no points for him since he has never been a big fan.
Skinsguy: How is is this hating on Lavar?
Heybigstar: Again how is pointing out a fact bashing Lavar? He simply made a statement of opinion based on fact. He wasn't questioning Lavar's ability in general. I'll be generous and give you 1/2 a point for this one.

So roughly only 37.5% of your supporting statements actually support you in my opinion.

10-24-2005, 11:34 AM	#34
FRPLG MVP Join Date: May 2004 Age: 47 Posts: 10,164	Re: Good Outing For LaVar (merged) Excuse me but WTF? Generalizing the arguments is somewhat silly to do but if you're going to do it then do it correctly. I think if you looked through everything that was said (good luck that'll take you all day) the main argument was that people trusted the coaches. Not that Arrington wasn't any good. Saying 90% of us said similar things is simply untrue. And to rebutt your rebutts. Exoffender: I'll give you this one. Offiss: A perrenial Arrington anti-fan. You get no points for him since he has never been a big fan. Skinsguy: How is is this hating on Lavar? Heybigstar: Again how is pointing out a fact bashing Lavar? He simply made a statement of opinion based on fact. He wasn't questioning Lavar's ability in general. I'll be generous and give you 1/2 a point for this one. So roughly only 37.5% of your supporting statements actually support you in my opinion.