Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231
And remember, McClain would be a post june 1 cut if we signed Hankins. We would get some relief.
Ive pretty much let it be known Hankins is a good signing at 1 to 3 year deal. He's a young, proven, run-stuffer entering his prime...Id take him over Vea or Payne at 13 without hesitation.
Is it smart by Hankins team to wait out after the draft? Shrinking options is never better for bargaining...He's taking on more risk for a smaller payday.
|
Cooley would agree with you, he likes Vea and Payne but
not at 13, Payne would be a great addition against the run but just a contributor against the pass, Vea has a tendency to take a play off.
He would take safeties
Derwin James and Minkah Fitzpatrick before them, he loves both DBs and is astonished by James' athleticism, he says he's a Pro Bowler every year:
http://cdn.stationcaster.com/station...1524233573.mp3
http://cdn.stationcaster.com/station...1524492552.mp3
Again,
signing Hankins would allow us to go
BPA (and trade down without worrying about missing on a critically needed DL...).