Quote:
Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule
I think it can be compared to how the praises were sung after the Iran deal.
Iran is not a much better actor than NK.
We both admit our biases here, but I think you still credit non Fox news as way too credible for what they really are.
News outlets today are simply sycophants for their preferred policies, and the politicians that support them.
|
The axis of evil....Ole Dub wasn't wrong about that.
NK and Iran are fairly dangerous in their own respect. NK being isolated really hurts their effectiveness as a country when its comes down to influence. They lack a respectable position even in their region. Militarily, they cannot fuel or feed their army either.
Iran on the other hand is the top Shai Muslim country in the world with a competent army. They have an intelligent service which is effective for that region...globally not so much. BUT, they have been have a competent money funneling system where they support Terrorism throughout the world. What is really strange about Iran is their people are relatively "modern" for the region and the country is more liberal than its Suni counterparts...Why that doesn't translate into their government is a strange....but it goes to show that the Ayatollah holds the most power in the country.
If you had to point to which is the more "dangerous" country? I think Iran easily wins...even with NK with a nuclear weapon...even if they can deliver it on a rocket. I think Iran with a nuclear weapon would be extremely dangerous with their terrorist connections.