Quote:
Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule
When nuclear was taken off the table, coal and oil dominance grew. The other types of clean energy have had plenty of subsidies and encouragement from government and public sector, but they simply don't have a solution to the complete demand. You don't and currently can't get the bang for your buck that you can for oil or coal solutions, even with the expense to make them cleaner.
There are solutions that involve nuclear power that could work, but the eco-green politicians would have no part of those.
The US still innovates, and cleaner technologies have made amazing progress for using less and less electricity. The issue is a physical matter of generating, storing and transporting energy to those devices and tech.
|
I hear ya Cred, I know nothing about energy -- clean energy, fossil energy -- but as a dummy looking from the outside in, I hope 50 years from now we still arent using coal and oil. Everything you said makes sense perfect and common sense.
But its not really us .. its fucking China and India etc needing to use clean renewable energy.
Whether or not I recycle this milk carton doesnt do anything when
China emits more emissions than all the developed countries combined.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-57018837