Quote:
|
Originally Posted by offiss
How do figure? The point being made is there has been plenty of players who have been written off and became good or great. I never said Ramsey would be Aikman, but he could be Brees, who I also compared his circumstance as well.
Funny if you have compared Aikman to lets say staubach in his 3rd year you would have been laughed at as well, how did that turn out?
If someone told you Drew Brees would be a pro bowler before the start of the 2004 season how would that have gone over?
I am not saying it will happen what I am saying just because a guy is on the bench, or is still growing as QB doesn't mean he wont become a good QB, some guy's take longer to fully develope.
YOU SEE!!!!!  |
Offiss, your entire argument regarding Ramsey boils down to one thing. You think he'd be good if he was just given the opportunity to play. But you don't even seem to consider that there might be a reason he's not getting that opportunity under Gibbs.
You also seem to glance over turnovers as if they're not of any importance when evaluating a QB. But in fact turnovers are the biggest reason any team wins or loses any given game. Brunell's 23 TDs to 10 INTs this year speaks for itself. The QB rating may have been 85.9 this year, just as Ramsey's was last year. But Brunell's QB rating was depressed by the number of times he chose to throw the ball away in tough situations rather than force passes.
Fumbles lost do not show up in the QB rating formula either. And that's what Ramsey does best. He's got a LONG way to go before he becomes Drew Brees.