Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post - Redskins 2005 Report Cards

BigSKINBauer · 02-01-2006, 09:52 AM

i think saying doc is only slightly better than hall and was as bad as royal is a little harsh. I say doc is deserving of a B- or better atleast. Otherwise i agree with most of them.

Antonio brown a C-. Does anyone still like this guy?? i still do. I think NFL europe will make him one mean catching machine. He doesn't cost much and i think he is fine for kick returns but then again so is betts.

also if you do give out A+s both my man Portis and expecially Randy thomas should get em

02-01-2006, 09:52 AM	#17
BigSKINBauer Pro Bowl Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Washington, DC Age: 38 Posts: 5,688	Re: Redskins 2005 Report Cards - Offense i think saying doc is only slightly better than hall and was as bad as royal is a little harsh. I say doc is deserving of a B- or better atleast. Otherwise i agree with most of them. Antonio brown a C-. Does anyone still like this guy?? i still do. I think NFL europe will make him one mean catching machine. He doesn't cost much and i think he is fine for kick returns but then again so is betts. also if you do give out A+s both my man Portis and expecially Randy thomas should get em