Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dirtbag359
So let me get this straight. The reason we want a CBA is because without one we can't restructure deals 3-7 years in the future since their will be no salary cap. And instead of restructuring guys like Jansen, Thomas, Arrington, and Washington we'll have to cut guys like Jansen and Washington to get under the cap. Then we're going to have to carry about 15 rookies on our roster like the Ravens did 2 years removed from the their Super Bowl win.
|
That's how I understand it.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dirtbag359
Also one more question:
Is the reason deals can't be restructured is because its not legal or it would be stupid for the players to do it?
|
Deals can't be restructured like they used to because we can't covert base salaries into bonuses over the next few seasons because there's no cap extension.
I think we can just convert salaries to bonuses and prorate them over the next two seasons.
As for whether it makes sense for the players to restructure, I simply don't know. It might make sense for players to renegotiate if they are well paid right now and they wouldn't command comparable money on the free agent market.
Canuck, care to chime in and help out with your expertise?