Quote:
|
Originally Posted by That Guy
basically right now we have a #1, #1.5, #2.5, #4 (thrash), #6 (brown), and #2000 (take wild guess here) WR on the roster. randle would be a #2.5, but he's really better as a #3.
if we get randle i don't know how you'd keep them all happy though. moss wouldn't care and talent wise, you have a clear #2... patten and randle are both very good #3s though and we simply have not run 4 WR sets here, and we don't use many 3 WR sets either.
|
Exactly. We'd be better off with Cooley, Moss, Lloyd, and Randle El on the Field than Patten instead of Cooley. BTW I like the numbering system. Puts things in perspective for morons like me.