View Single Post
Old 03-22-2006, 06:30 PM   #11
Huddle
Special Teams
 
Huddle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 352
Re: Brunell vs. Bledsoe

That Guy

Quote:
this whole thread went stupid. you claim any dissenting view is strictly opinion, yet whatever your opinion happens to be is fact. Its worthless argueing cause you're being an f/ing brick wall and logic is on the other side.
You have a tough time staying civil when people don't agree with you...don't you?

Quote:
when you have multiple variables, you make multiple equations and you CAN find out A, B, C or D individually from them. that's basic math.
Right, basic math with a false analogy. What we're talking about here is more like trying to solve an equation where there are no givens. We can think of five or six factors which can influence the statistic and we can't isolate and accurately measure any of them.

Quote:
portis in washington still put up monsster numbers. its not like his stats got cut in half. situation does play a role, but like i said, the individual player plays a much bigger role on his own statline.
Probably but if you offered a percentage on how much to give the player's performance, you'd have to reach behind you to find it.

Quote:
portis went from 1500 to 1300, and next year i bet he goes back up. Fact is, he stayed above 1300 every season. some backs can't break 800 yards, some back never get 1000. denver switched backs, but kept the system (and got better QB play), and yet the replacements weren't as good...
Tatum Bell had fewer carries but a much higher YPC. does that stat prove he was better?

Quote:
that must mean that portis is better, and, OMGWTFLOLZ!!!! the STATS bear that out.
Why stop there? You can prove Clinton's better than Jim Brown if you choose your stats carefully.
Huddle is offline  

Advertisements
 
Page generated in 0.13961 seconds with 10 queries