Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post - What doe the Washington Post have against the Redskins?

Luxorreb · 03-28-2006, 02:55 AM

Nothing to do with Taylor, but as a kid the Washington Post was the only source of Redskins news. The Sports section was packed with info, stories and back stories. These days its pretty skeletal. Online is pathetic coverage and print version is lackluster in this day and age of information. I count on thewarpath.net for a combination of ALL Redskins news. Thanks to all Warpathers!!! Post has been slacking for a few years since the seat debate happened. As far as redskins.com has developed in the last 3 years.... A plus plus!!! Remember when? Bucs site killed ours? Redskins.com the best out there right now!!! GO SKINS!!!

03-28-2006, 02:55 AM	#20
Luxorreb ^21^ Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Richmond, Virginia Age: 54 Posts: 1,630	Re: What doe the Washington Post have against the Redskins? Nothing to do with Taylor, but as a kid the Washington Post was the only source of Redskins news. The Sports section was packed with info, stories and back stories. These days its pretty skeletal. Online is pathetic coverage and print version is lackluster in this day and age of information. I count on thewarpath.net for a combination of ALL Redskins news. Thanks to all Warpathers!!! Post has been slacking for a few years since the seat debate happened. As far as redskins.com has developed in the last 3 years.... A plus plus!!! Remember when? Bucs site killed ours? Redskins.com the best out there right now!!! GO SKINS!!! __________________ ^21^