Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post - NFL meeting: rules, changes, replacing tags.

D'BOYZ · 03-28-2006, 05:32 PM

OK No on the Horse Collar rule I agree people get hurth but come on it's football you're sopouse 2 be tough I played the game my hole life its a physicall sport that's why I love it if you don't want contact play baseball that's a sport evenb girls can play.

every time they put more of this rules to protect the players it hurts the game yeah they are trying to prevent unecesary injuries but hey at 1 point it's going to become flag football.

No on the rule for Quarterbacks .... come on there's no real way tha ta Defensive player can controle that really I played DE my hole life you can try not hitting him in the face but really once you're in the air you can stop.

No on the celebration rule... .they're taking away some of the spectacule and emotion out of the game when I used to play in college and made a sack or returned a Fumble for a TD you had to control your emotions because it cost you a flag and it SUCKED ( I got flag a lot hahaha), this is a mans high testosterone sport humilliate the other team is part of the game ( offcourse there are limmits) but to say no it takes the fun out of the game.

yes on making all the calls reviewable come on we all had questionable flags like pass interferance that weren't there and got called and sometimes there're some that don't get called I remmember last year thanksgiven game against Denver great game it went to OT and on the run that Ron Dayne almost took for a TD but sealled the game there was a clear holding on Glover that didn't get called it should be reviewable because it totally afected the outcome of that game.

Yes on taking away fall starts that don't have an outcome on the play (flinches) how many times a fallstart has been called and you can't even see it on replay ..... example Seattle in the SB.

No on expanding the playoffs from 12 to 14 or 16 teams, taht blows it's going to let mediocare teams get in to the playoffs and its going to take away achievements teams have done trough out the season. After the games we lost last year and ow we were playing I didn't believe we deserved to be in the playoffs and with the new rule we might had a chance I just don't like it the playoffs is for the best team in each conference not the somewhat best and even wit hthat we get 8-8 teams in the current way.

Yes on defensive players to use head phones for signals it gives the same chance as it does to QB's

Yes on reducing the callenge from 90 to 60 seconds, it just takes 2 long and if the referee didn't saw desputable evidance that it should over rule the call on the field in 60 second he won't see it in 90 it just makes it boring.

03-28-2006, 05:32 PM	#45
D'BOYZ The Starter Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 1,363	Re: NFL meeting: rules, changes, replacing tags. OK No on the Horse Collar rule I agree people get hurth but come on it's football you're sopouse 2 be tough I played the game my hole life its a physicall sport that's why I love it if you don't want contact play baseball that's a sport evenb girls can play. every time they put more of this rules to protect the players it hurts the game yeah they are trying to prevent unecesary injuries but hey at 1 point it's going to become flag football. No on the rule for Quarterbacks .... come on there's no real way tha ta Defensive player can controle that really I played DE my hole life you can try not hitting him in the face but really once you're in the air you can stop. No on the celebration rule... .they're taking away some of the spectacule and emotion out of the game when I used to play in college and made a sack or returned a Fumble for a TD you had to control your emotions because it cost you a flag and it SUCKED ( I got flag a lot hahaha), this is a mans high testosterone sport humilliate the other team is part of the game ( offcourse there are limmits) but to say no it takes the fun out of the game. yes on making all the calls reviewable come on we all had questionable flags like pass interferance that weren't there and got called and sometimes there're some that don't get called I remmember last year thanksgiven game against Denver great game it went to OT and on the run that Ron Dayne almost took for a TD but sealled the game there was a clear holding on Glover that didn't get called it should be reviewable because it totally afected the outcome of that game. Yes on taking away fall starts that don't have an outcome on the play (flinches) how many times a fallstart has been called and you can't even see it on replay ..... example Seattle in the SB. No on expanding the playoffs from 12 to 14 or 16 teams, taht blows it's going to let mediocare teams get in to the playoffs and its going to take away achievements teams have done trough out the season. After the games we lost last year and ow we were playing I didn't believe we deserved to be in the playoffs and with the new rule we might had a chance I just don't like it the playoffs is for the best team in each conference not the somewhat best and even wit hthat we get 8-8 teams in the current way. Yes on defensive players to use head phones for signals it gives the same chance as it does to QB's Yes on reducing the callenge from 90 to 60 seconds, it just takes 2 long and if the referee didn't saw desputable evidance that it should over rule the call on the field in 60 second he won't see it in 90 it just makes it boring.