Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Huddle
PSUSkinsFan21
Of course not. It's irrelevant because the Spurrier rotation had nothing to do with preparing a rookie QB for the NFL which is what the discussion on the table is about.
The Brown's situation is relevant because the platooning was intended to prepare a young QB for the NFL...which is what we're discussing. Charlie Frye performed very well by most accounts.
You're making this personal already?
|
The Browns had the luxury of making their preparation of a young QB a primary goal because the Browns had nothing else to play for. The Skins have a playoff caliber team and a team that is potentially a Super Bowl contender. So the Browns are in a completely different situation than the Skins, so your Browns example is completely
irrelevant. Unless you're suggesting we should strive for a sub-par season with zero chances of making the playoffs.
The Ramsey point has already been made by Matty.