Quote:
|
Originally Posted by D'BOYZ
I get your point on this 1 but there's a think about overpaying and this type of moves limmits you to not allways get that player that fits your sistem bacause you're out of leverage. Now we know for expirience that FA like drafts not allways result and your team is limmiting it's chance to get good replacement for those players.
Because of FA and not draft your team doesn't has dept in a lot of areas becasue FA cost more is ST goes down, or rogers or washignton yo udon't have a capable backup behind them that's what not having picks does to you
|
There's a better chance of upgrading a team in fa. And I think (even if it goes against the grain) that depth is a luxury and not a necessity. Almost every team is concerned when a starter goes down, whether it's Pittsburgh with Polamalu or with the Redskins and Sean Taylor.
I'm not sure you are either right or wrong about overpaying, but I know that you haven't listed any evidence that the redskins are overpaying. Just like how some experts were thinking that half of the starters on the team would be rookies. How crazy does that sound now ?
I think the way to see whether a team, like redskins, have done well in the offseason is to compare the roster of players and coaches from the end of the season to the roster at the current moment. Did the redskins improve a great deal ? Hell yeah and they were a playoff team last year.