Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Giantone
I never said you "did'nt" have wepond just not the same ones and I noticed that people are still ignoring the learning factor of the O .
Cooly is the same as Gonzo ???????????? Ahhhh NO .
Portis to Holmes ...ahhhh NO to that to .
Over the last two years Brunell can't touch Green .
Last year no but I will give you the recieving core this year .
|
Yep. Cooley is the same as Gonzo. Gonzo is on the tail end of his prime and Cooley is just entering his.
2005 Washington Redskins 16 16 7177410.93276044
2005 Kansas City Chiefs 16 16 78 90511.63929045
Compare those stats. Cooley had only 110 yards less than Gonzo AND 5 more TDs. Let's also remember that Gonzo is their PRIMARY receiver because they have no one else. Cooley shared receptions with the second leading receiver in the league.
Brunell AGAIN is far superior to Green.
2005Washington Redskins161545426257.730506.7278231027/21336985.92005Kansas City Chiefs161650731762.540147.9260171032/204511190.1
Get all the yards you want, but TDs are where it counts. Also, playoff wins are where it counts. I won't deny that Brunell is HIGHLY ineffective when he's hurt, but Green couldn't hold Brunell's johnson when he's healthy.
And let's not even get started on the Portis and Holmes thing. It's ALMOST comparing apples to oranges because Holmes is like Gonzo, on his way out of his prime and Portis is just entering his. The jury is still out on that one, but you would have to come up with a pretty good argument to convince me that Holmes was/is better than Portis if Portis keeps up his current production.