Quote:
Originally Posted by canthetuna
So you're saying TO's season was circumstantial, but Lloyd's wasnt???
All things even and in current circumstances I think we have a better tandem at reciever. Mainly because we have 2 different types of recievers in Moss and Lloyd, who can open up a playbook with possibilities, where glenn and TO are pretty much the same body type, build and type of reciever.
I'm not at all saying TO and Glenn arent good, I just honestly think we're better. Brandon Lloyd will be widely heralded around here next season. jmho....
|
I don't see it. I think that T.O. and Glenn are complete opposites. Fairy is not a possesion receiver as he only hurts you downfield. Glenn does not have what it takes to hurt you over the middle (see Dallas game). I would say that Moss' body type is closer to Glenn's than T.O.'s. T.O. is a beast and against most D.B.'s (not named B. Dawkins, or G. Reaper) he takes short passes creates space and is a threat on short, medium and deep plays. That is why T.O. is so good he can hurt a secondary in every way imaginable.
Moss and Glenn kill you with speed but Moss is definitely a step above Glenn. The wide reciever screen against K.C. last year completely changed how I viewed Moss. I knew that Moss could go over the top, but I didn't know that he was fast enough to create a bad angle for a safety. That play was disgusting.
Bottom line. T.O. is at least a tier better Moss and a few tiers better than Lloyd. I think that Moss and Lloyd are better than Glenn but not enough to give the edge to us.