09-18-2006, 01:26 PM
|
#6
|
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 783
|
Re: Al Saunders: was he necessary?
Quote:
Originally Posted by onlydarksets
Lets put this to rest. Here is the breakdown by quarter:
Code:
FIRST SECOND
Pass Run Pass Run
Q1 3 1 2 2
Q2 1 3 2 2
Q3 1 4 0 1
Q4 7 1 5 0
Obviously, we ran on 1st/2nd downs a LOT more in the first three quarters. We gave up the run in the fourth when we had no choice.
If the announcers are to be believed, I blame this one on Gibbs. They quoted him as saying that we were going to run the ball a LOT more tonight because he thought 17 touches was not enough (FWIW, I agree). However, that suggests he took some control back from Saunders. How the hell are the players supposed to learn the system if Saunders isn't allowed to run it?
|
Fair enough.
|
|
|