Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

illdefined · 09-18-2006, 11:00 PM

nobody's answered this question though:

after suffering the losses it takes to get Brunell fluent in this new offense, what are we going to do with a 36 year old QB?

i assume Gibbs figured Brunell would've acclimated to Saunders offense more quickly than Campbell, but it clearly hasn't been that quick.

I really think Campbell's fresher legs and arm alone may won one of those games (whats the point of Brunell not throwing INTs if he doesn't throw any TDs?), either way the much needed experience would have been a boon for Campbell on his way to being our QB of the future. with Brunell, WHATS THE UPSIDE?

09-18-2006, 11:00 PM	#333
illdefined Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: nyc Age: 50 Posts: 2,631	Re: Time to bench Brunell? (Mega-merge) nobody's answered this question though: after suffering the losses it takes to get Brunell fluent in this new offense, what are we going to do with a 36 year old QB? i assume Gibbs figured Brunell would've acclimated to Saunders offense more quickly than Campbell, but it clearly hasn't been that quick. I really think Campbell's fresher legs and arm alone may won one of those games (whats the point of Brunell not throwing INTs if he doesn't throw any TDs?), either way the much needed experience would have been a boon for Campbell on his way to being our QB of the future. with Brunell, WHATS THE UPSIDE? __________________ a fan. not a cheerleader.