View Single Post
Old 09-21-2006, 01:17 PM   #64
pg86
No new threads for you
 
pg86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,959
Re: Al Saunders: was he necessary?

Quote:
Originally Posted by joegibbsuperbowl View Post
Saunders offense needs a drop back QB. It is the same offense they ran with the Rams and KC.


Brunell is a bootleg/ roll out QB.

The offense will not work unless we bench Brunell and put in Collins.
What did I say?? I know it sounds like a bad idea..but this offense would be dynamite with collins at the helm simply because as long as the line holds up he can bomb one downfield to that dangerous reciving unit we have! Or run it up the gut with portis..or hell...with this offense we could run sweeps the line needs to block though. Yes Collins is pretty much second rate to Brunell Stat wise and stuff but think about it...Collins did ok with the bills didn't he?

Im rethinking my position on this because Cambell really isn't gonna do much better than brunell with this new system because He isnt used to it, Collins would He has experience with the system, and despite Collins muff ups in preseason try to remember that was not the starting O line or the starting O he was dealing with, and that he scored the only points in preseason right? If Brunell can't learn this system in time.....ie this weekend and the next week then put in collins.

If we keep Cambell and we keep this system..and Gibbs sticks around, and we can actually maintain what we have on offense in time we probably will be dominant....we do need to incorperate some of Gibbs plays into that playbook though...Gibbs roll outs and pull traps work at every level when u have a line!
pg86 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
 
Page generated in 0.27884 seconds with 10 queries