Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

jdlea · 10-23-2006, 03:08 PM

First of all, Campbell is not a cure-all. I've said plenty of times he doesn't translate to wins. What it means is that since they're going to lose, they'll now lose with a purpose so that a 22/23 year old can learn how to play. Not for a 36 year old to try to learn how to play QB in this system. They're 2-5, they're not going to make the playoffs. Everyone can try to feed me this bs about being 2.5 games back of Philly. Well, the Skins have yet to win 3 games this season against a few mediocre teams so far. So, what makes everyone think they'd somehow make up 3 games against Philly? Cause they play them twice? Well, the d stops no one and the O doesn't put points on the board...that doesn't translate to many wins.

I'm not saying that it is all on Mark Brunell. However, he's the only change that can be made. You can't replace 11 guys on defense. You're not gonna find replacements for everyone playing poorly on defense. You can replace the quarterback, if for nothing else, just ot let the kid learn how to play in the NFL. That's what's important now, getting Campbell ready to play. Leaving Mark in is just stupid.

Now, to absolve Mark Brunell from blame is wrong. I don't understand how anyone can watch that game and think "if they stretched the field they wouldn't be a better team." The defense is bad, so you have to put up points to win. Does anyone ever see a defense's win-loss record? No, but guess what you do see...a quarterback's win-loss record. Mark Brunell's with the Skins? 16-21. That's bad. If he were young I'd say he's developing, but he's old, so he's regressing. There is no reason to leave him in. They could have gone 2-5 with Campbell. And Brunell didn't show me anything that Campbell couldn't have done yesterday. I don't watch Brunell and even think that I can't make the throws he's making. It's embarassing.

Tom Jackson regularly references "the eye test." That's his football eye, Mark Brunell doesn't pass that. Hell, Aikman (a pretty damn good qb in his day) was wondering aloud why Brunell kept checking the damn ball down. So, I would say that's someone around the league that doesn't think he's getting the job done. Oh, and Shannon Sharpe called him out last week. He doesn't think he's getting it done either.

To the question as to what I would think if Campbell came in and did the same thing? I'd blame the coaches. However, I don't believe that Saunders' offense is all checkdowns and screens. I refuse to believe it. Maybe they'd put Jason in and leave the training wheels on for a while so they would be short passes, but I'll be really disappointed. If this is the offense, there's something wrong. I'd say heads should roll, but that doesn't usually help build stability (not the Skins strong point recently). However, I think Gibbs is smart enough to know that you can't win in the NFL throwing that many short passes.

10-23-2006, 03:08 PM	#153
jdlea Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Arlington, VA Age: 41 Posts: 3,109	Re: It's not Brunell's fault! First of all, Campbell is not a cure-all. I've said plenty of times he doesn't translate to wins. What it means is that since they're going to lose, they'll now lose with a purpose so that a 22/23 year old can learn how to play. Not for a 36 year old to try to learn how to play QB in this system. They're 2-5, they're not going to make the playoffs. Everyone can try to feed me this bs about being 2.5 games back of Philly. Well, the Skins have yet to win 3 games this season against a few mediocre teams so far. So, what makes everyone think they'd somehow make up 3 games against Philly? Cause they play them twice? Well, the d stops no one and the O doesn't put points on the board...that doesn't translate to many wins. I'm not saying that it is all on Mark Brunell. However, he's the only change that can be made. You can't replace 11 guys on defense. You're not gonna find replacements for everyone playing poorly on defense. You can replace the quarterback, if for nothing else, just ot let the kid learn how to play in the NFL. That's what's important now, getting Campbell ready to play. Leaving Mark in is just stupid. Now, to absolve Mark Brunell from blame is wrong. I don't understand how anyone can watch that game and think "if they stretched the field they wouldn't be a better team." The defense is bad, so you have to put up points to win. Does anyone ever see a defense's win-loss record? No, but guess what you do see...a quarterback's win-loss record. Mark Brunell's with the Skins? 16-21. That's bad. If he were young I'd say he's developing, but he's old, so he's regressing. There is no reason to leave him in. They could have gone 2-5 with Campbell. And Brunell didn't show me anything that Campbell couldn't have done yesterday. I don't watch Brunell and even think that I can't make the throws he's making. It's embarassing. Tom Jackson regularly references "the eye test." That's his football eye, Mark Brunell doesn't pass that. Hell, Aikman (a pretty damn good qb in his day) was wondering aloud why Brunell kept checking the damn ball down. So, I would say that's someone around the league that doesn't think he's getting the job done. Oh, and Shannon Sharpe called him out last week. He doesn't think he's getting it done either. To the question as to what I would think if Campbell came in and did the same thing? I'd blame the coaches. However, I don't believe that Saunders' offense is all checkdowns and screens. I refuse to believe it. Maybe they'd put Jason in and leave the training wheels on for a while so they would be short passes, but I'll be really disappointed. If this is the offense, there's something wrong. I'd say heads should roll, but that doesn't usually help build stability (not the Skins strong point recently). However, I think Gibbs is smart enough to know that you can't win in the NFL throwing that many short passes.