Quote:
Originally Posted by chris36
You are extremely hard headed, sometimes it is better just to admit you are wrong. I was simply stating what is on the cap page. Which I tend to beleive more so than you.
This is your best gues from memory. But in the case that you are correct, they kept him because it made no monetary sense to let him go. That was not your argument for keeping him. You are at this point, contradicticting yourself.
|
you're an idiot. why should i admit i'm wrong when it's clear you can't read?
you see the note about how the contract was adjusted in this offseason? that changed the 2006 and 2007 figures, BUT IT'S IN THE CAP SHEET you say you've read. once the extra 2.8 went from salary to signing bonus, the economics of ditching wynn changed. i even linked to f'ing articles from the time showing that cutting him would clearly save cap space. I'm sorry you've decided to side with ignorance, but trying to teach brick walls is a waste of my time. though it is amusing that you'd call me hard-headed when you're the one that's repeatedly reciting false information, even after the actual facts are presented.
and my arguement for keeping him is simply that unless you have a reason to let him go (ie getting a better player with his cap space), there's no reason to do so. Once again, i'd appreciate if you actually took the time to at least read my posts before wasting your time with pointless replies.