Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post - What Big Name On Defense Is Most Likely To Be Gone???

Schneed10 · 01-04-2007, 04:26 PM

Wynn would represent a savings of $2.5 million if we cut him. They will certainly try to force him to accept a paycut, and they'll have leverage because he's not worth what his current contract says he is. If he doesn't accept the paycut, they'll axe him.

On Daniels, he would represent a $1.9 million savings if we cut him. But I can't see them cutting both Daniels and Wynn. That would leave us really thin at DE.

I can only see one or the other being gone at most, and quite honestly I think both will be back.

01-04-2007, 04:26 PM	#8
Schneed10 A Dude Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Newtown Square, PA Age: 46 Posts: 12,458	Re: What Big Name On Defense Is Most Likely To Be Gone??? Wynn would represent a savings of $2.5 million if we cut him. They will certainly try to force him to accept a paycut, and they'll have leverage because he's not worth what his current contract says he is. If he doesn't accept the paycut, they'll axe him. On Daniels, he would represent a $1.9 million savings if we cut him. But I can't see them cutting both Daniels and Wynn. That would leave us really thin at DE. I can only see one or the other being gone at most, and quite honestly I think both will be back. __________________ God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.