Quote:
Originally Posted by jsarno
While I understand the commonly used terms, they are placed by humans to help understand a process. We, as humans, are flawed and make mistakes. Just because we call it a "law" doesn't make it so. I have used the same argument on this over and over by saying everyone said the world was flat...it was a "law" until someone had the guts to keep going. Then it was broken. I'm sure you heard the expression, all laws are made to be broken. I am not debating Thermodynamics, I just beleive that in our time this "law" will change. Then what will it be when it is changed? Simply a theory.
|
OK you're right, if we ever prove that matter can be destroyed, then the law of thermodynamics will no longer be considered a law.
But that doesn't change the fact that every single one of those examples of destroying matter that you provided (black hole, vaporizing, atom smashing) do not destroy matter. They only change it's state. I just think that before you go trying to use science to explain your beliefs, you should understand science a lot better first.
For a guy who has been harassing me to consider other viewpoints, you seem to have deeply rooted beliefs without giving any consideration to gaining knowledge of correct science. To me, that's not giving proper consideration to the opposing viewpoint.