Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill B
Wouldn't it be more prudent to trade the pick down anyway so the Skins can address 2 needs:
1.) Acquire more draft picks because the defense has too many holes that one pick cannot address.
2.) By trading down they will not have to pay as much in up front bonus money and this will aid in the salary cap - since we have to re-sign Dockery I would think not having to fork over a huge signing bonus (which a 6th pick will require) will help the Redskins deal with their cap. Yes we can restrucutre contracts but I would think this will help the Redskins deal with future cap situations - specifically dealing and lowering the dead cap hits the team has so we have more flexibility.
By having more lower round picks you have more chances of acquiring a good player or two and it will be a much better bargain compared to a high first round pick. If I remember correctly didn't the Detriot Lions in 2003 take a can't miss reciever at number 2 with Charles Rogers? Whatever happened to that guy - is he even in the NFL anymore? He also got a huge signing bonus too.
|
Word. If you whiff on one of those top 10 picks, especially a top 5 pick, you really hurt your salary cap situation.
I hardly ever see a team that's about to draft in the top 5 who I
don't think should try to trade down. Your odds are much better by taking more selections in the lower portions of the first round, and the second and third rounds.