|
Re: Vick's Bottle Tested Negative
Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69
The difference is the crime. OJ sliced off two peoples heads.
|
My point, and I think sportscurmudgeon's, was that OJ was found not guilty and so was Vick (in a way). Grim was saying that you can't compare the two because OJ probably killed two people whereas Vick didn't acutally have pot on him, but of course you can. All the evidence seems to imply that they both committed a crime of some sort but they both ended up getting out of it. So Grim seems to think that OJ got away with doing something illegal while Vick never did anything illegal, so he's not contradicting himself.
I'm not trying to compare their crimes in the least, especially since I think pot should be decriminalized. I just have a problem with his arguement.
__________________
"Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man." The Dude
|