Quote:
Originally Posted by Buster
|
I agree that we don't know the cause of global climate change. However, that article is almost worthless.
First, the author repeatedly states that humans are not the cause of global climate change, yet it NEVER gives any evidence -- not even once. If you can find some evidence there, please correct me.
Second, he asserts that Michael Crichton is a scientist and he cites one of his recent works: "State of Fear". While Michael Crichton does have degrees in anthropology and medicine, that would hardly qualify him as an acceptable source on climate change. Also, the book "State of Fear" is a fiction -- how can anyone possibly cite a work of fiction to support an argument, and expect to be taken seriously?
Third:
Quote:
|
In another instance, I was accused by Canadian environmentalist David Suzuki of being paid by oil companies. That is a lie. Apparently he thinks if the fossil fuel companies pay you have an agenda. So if Greenpeace, Sierra Club or governments pay there is no agenda and only truth and enlightenment?
|
Judging by this statement, the author is receiving funds from "fossil fuel companies". Yet, rather than apply a sound defense to the accusation, he resorts to the "red herring" fallacy. Everyone has an agenda -- especially if you are receiving funds from a large interest group.